Moygara Castle, Co.Sligo

Tags

,

Moygara Castle, County Sligo and the O’Garas of Coolavin is published this month by Four Courts Press which comprises contributions from a range of experts on its history and archaeology. The castle (Mon. No. SL044-052) consists of a four towers with high curtain walls, a gatehouse and the remains of a tower house. I initially examined mortars from the castle through Maura O’Gara-O-Riordan in 2008 on behalf of the O’Gara Clan, with a conservation report prepared for P.J. O’Neill, the owner of Moygara Castle, in 2009. The Royal Irish Academy facilitated dating of mortar samples through their Radiocarbon Data Scheme. The findings of the mortar analyses were written up as a chapter for this publication. The book is the result of the work of the Moygara Castle Research and Conservation Project which began in 2005.

Long-term performance of lime-based repairs in Ireland

In 2000, a stone decay study assessed 61 mortared stone monuments considered representative of the most common and important stone types in Ireland. 12 of these monuments, including 5 medieval buildings and a 19th century fortification were repointed with lime-based repair mortars soon after the 2000 study. The study was repeated in 2010 and again in 2020 to understand how these monuments had changed over time, deterioration rates, how effective repair works (including repointing) were, and what happened when no conservation works were carried out. The findings of this research are being published in a series of scientific papers.

The re-assessment of stone monuments at intervals was found to be a powerful tool to understand the long-term nature of stone decay processes, and also provided insights into the weathering of historic lime-based mortars and of the performance of modern lime-based repair mortars over a twenty year period of performance. The study also highlighted the stark contrast between the diversity of historic building materials and the relatively small palette of modern materials; the key role of the masonry-mortar system in understanding the failure and success of lime-based mortar repairs; and the potential value of follow-up case studies to improve conservation practice and research.

From the perspective of a practitioner, there is a relatively small range of modern lime materials available in the EU to ‘match’ problems in historic buildings and monuments built with a diverse range of stone types and mortars. Due to regional diversity, there are challenges in adopting the solutions and approaches taken by other researchers as environmental conditions and weathering stresses are not uniform across Europe. A medieval church in a hilltop town in Italy, in the heart of Athens, on an island in Sweden or on the Atlantic coast of Ireland will experience different environmental conditions, and lime-based repairs to those monuments will experience different intensities of natural wet/dry, freeze/thaw cycling and salt action. In addition, arguably most historic building materials were sourced from the local area or region, and reflect the diversity of the local geology and building traditions. In Ireland, while there are a number of relatively ‘pure’ limestones; a great many Irish limestones contain impurities, and when burned produce naturally hydraulic lime. In addition, historic lime in Ireland was also made by burning magnesian limestones, marbles and marine shell in coastal areas; with brick pozzolan and ash commonly added to mortars from 1700 onwards. The often complex mix of local stones and locally produced historic lime mortars found in historic buildings and monuments is an important component of the regional diversity of European cultural heritage; but also poses significant challenges for scientific researchers asked to provide universal solutions for lime-based repair mortars which can be used for in-situ application by practitioners focused on site- and case-specific issues. There is an unfortunate potential for significant divergence between the work or researchers and practitioners; but there is also potential for better synergies if suitable common ground and areas of dialogue can be identified. In particular, it would be useful to identify what practitioners are most concerned about, to consider is research addressing these areas, or if existing research outcomes can already be used to address current practical concerns.

A general finding of the assessment of 61 mortared stone monuments over a twenty year period was that modern lime-based repairs show no evidence or indications of long-term incompatibility with historic porous stones; unlike the incompatibility between Portland Cement repair mortars and porous building stones widely reported in the professional literature. In the short-term, lime-based repair mortars do not appear to commonly fail because of an inherent incompatibility or failure of the material itself. Instead, short-term failures of modern lime-based repair mortars were found to be uncommon. Where failure occurred, it could often be attributed to external factors such as workmanship, the failure of other elements of the building fabric, or inattention to the dynamics between a mortar-masonry system and the weathering stresses experienced at the building.

Recent Publication: Bolton, J. (2023) “Long-term performance of lime-based repairs in Ireland: Seapoint Martello Tower and the Romanesque doorway of Clonfert Cathedral, 2000-2020”, in Valek, J, et al [eds]
RILEM TC 277-LHS Workshop Lime-based repairs for repairing historic structures, 3-4 Feb 2022, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece , Pp.157-164

Fortifications, hydraulic limes and natural cements in Ireland during the Napoleonic Wars

Tags

, ,

Conservation works to historic buildings and archaeological monuments depend on a thorough understanding of not only the significance of the structure, but the vulnerabilities and repair needs of the physical fabric. This study collated archaeological research, historical research and the scientific analysis of building materials found in a series of early 19th century military fortifications; and provides a ‘snapshot’ of construction technology in Ireland at the time.

The fortifications consist of Martello towers and gun batteries built between 1804 and 1806 on the coast of Dublin; built using granite, limestone and volcanic rocks, as well as brick, plastering, rendering, bedding and pointing mortars. The study looked at the building process from design, to sourcing and manufacturing building materials, to the physical evidence of two centuries of change and later alteration. This provided a clear understanding of the original materials and finish of the masonry fortifications, as well as as insight into construction practices in early 19th century Dublin. In addition, the study highlighted they key complicating factors and decay issues arising from weathering and later interventions which can inform future conservation and repair works to similarly aged buildings.

Hydraulic lime mortars and natural cements used in the construction of the fortifications, 1804-1806.

Bolton, J. (2021) “Blood, lime and sand: Fortifications, hydraulic limes and natural cements in Ireland during the Napoleonic Wars”, Journal of the Building Limes Forum, Volume 27, 2020, Pp.8-20

Bird Control for Historic Buildings

Tags

, ,

Pest birds such as feral pigeons and other troublesome species can cause significant problems for historic buildings. Droppings leave unsightly stains and can initiate decay mechanisms and encourage algal growth, and pose a health risk to those having to remove the droppings. Feathers, droppings and dead birds can block vents and rainwater goods leading to a variety of problems. The acidic droppings contain pathogens which are a risk to human health and can lead to respiratory and skin problems. Historic buildings are particularly vulnerable as the sheltered niches, crevices and ledges found on ornamental facades can form ideal habitats for birds to perch, roost and nest.

A wide variety of bird-deterrence technology has been developed, each of which has advantages, disadvantages, risks and limitations. Most of the systems have been designed to make the building habitat unattractive to birds. This can take the form of netting, mesh, spikes, sprung wires, repellent gels or my adding a sloping cap on a ledge so it becomes too uncomfortable to perch. However, these need to be carefully detailed to avoid visual disturbance, and need to be replaced at intervals.

Continue reading →

Damp and Moisture Problems

Tags

, ,

Moisture is a well-known problem in older buildings, and water is involved in most of the processes that break down building materials from timber decay to salt action to metal corrosion.

However, dampness in historic buildings can be easily mis-diagnosed, and past repairs have sometimes only concealed the symptoms of the problem rather than addressing the cause. Rising Damp has become a catch-all phrase for a wide range of moisture problems – even those where liquid water percolates from above. However, true ‘rising damp’ (capillary rise from the water table) is unlikely to be the cause of serious moisture problems except under very specific circumstances. Electronic moisture meters are commonly used to ‘diagnose’ rising damp, but often give false readings. These meters are reasonably reliable for timber, but are not as accurate for plaster, stone, brick or painted surfaces, and are greatly affected if salts are present.

Inspection and diagnosis includes visual inspection of the problem areas backed up by investigation, sampling, testing and monitoring where required. The solutions to damp and moisture problems are varied, and depend on the individual circumstances. For instance, a condition assessment may reveal that moisture ingress originates from an unexpected source, perhaps ground levels may need to be reduced, or a specific lime-based plaster or dry-lining system may be needed.

For queries on the consultancy for damp and moisture problems, from initial investigation and diagnosis to drying out of fire/flood damaged buildings , please email

Stone consolidation

Stone consolidants have been used on historic buildings since the 19th century to restore strength to a degraded stone or plaster. Recent research into the long-term effectiveness of stone consolidants applied in the 1960s and 1970s have shown their effectiveness in preserving historic monuments and sculpture which otherwise would have been lost.

There is a wide range of different consolidant products formulated for use on different historic stones and plasters. Selecting the best consolidant treatment requires Continue reading →

Plaster Condition Survey

Historic Plaster Condition Surveys are a special investigative type of condition assessment carried out to understand why a plaster ceiling or wall is failing, especially  where the problems are complex, or when new services such as light, AC or fire protection are to be introduced. The objectives of a survey of historic plaster are to:

  • Identify the nature, type and composition of materials used. This may require laboratory analysis.
  • Evaluate the current condition and extent of damage, and identify the symptoms of deterioration
  • Evaluate the possible cause(s) of failure
  • Assess the likely performance of the plaster in the short and medium term

The Historic Plaster Condition Survey report will present the results of the on-site inspections, any opening-up or investigative work, laboratory analysis, desktop research, with appropriate illustrations (such as photographs, drawings, rectified photographs or condition mapping) to identify the cause(s) of damage with recommendations for scope of repairs and any next steps.

For queries, please email jboltonconservation@gmail.com

historic_plaster_condition_survey

 

Wigging

Irish ‘wigging‘ is one of a number of historic pointing finishes for facades in Ireland. Wigging was an Irish variant of English ‘tuck’ pointing, a technique used between the 18th and early 20th century to create the illusion of expensive high-quality rubbed and gauged brickwork. There are a surprising range of historic pointing techniques which survive, especially on facades. Unfortunately, the condition of these are often poorly understood and a great deal of sound, functioning mortar is removed during modern repointing works. A condition assessment of a historic building should determine the type(s) of historic finish which survive, and how much, if any, requires repointing.

Historic brick pointing, c.1737

Historic paint analysis

Investigation and analysis of historic paints informs an understanding of paint and décor surviving in a building or structure and its conservation needs. Historic paint and architectural research can form part of a Condition Assessment and are are informed by a laboratory analysis which may include:

  • Stratigraphic study of the paint layers
  • Pigment identification
  • Binding media analysis
  • Presence of Lead in Historic Paint
  • Plaster Analysis

The pricing process of historic paint analysis begins with determining the client’s needs. For queries, please email jboltonconservation@gmail.com

Continuity of Conservation Services during Covid-19

Tags

, , ,

The majority of services to clients are continuing to be met during this difficult and unprecedented period. 

Historic Building Materials Analysis is continuing. This includes analysis of historic lime mortars, plasters, renders, stone, brick, tiles, slates, historic paint etc. and the production of reports and specifications. Microscopic analysis and physical and durability testing is unaffected, but more detailed laboratory work is not currently possible. Samples can be posted directly for analysis. Please email jboltonconservation@gmail.com to discuss project requirements and current turnaround times.

Site surveys, recording, in-situ testing, building environmental assessments, condition assessments and other on-site work is currently paused following government guidance. It is expected that these will resume during the easing of COVID-19 restrictions. Working practices and procedures for site work are continuing to evolve, and will be reviewed and updated in the light of guidance from government, health authorities and industry recommendations such as the recent best practice from the CIF.

Desktop Reports are continuing for all current projects. These include Planning Reports, Specifications and Schedules for Repair and Conservation, Architectural Heritage Impact Assessments, Archaeological Impact Assessments, Underwater Archaeological Impact Assessments and Historical Reports. For any new projects, please call or email jboltonconservation@gmail.com

All Meetings are currently Virtual including building advisory service, consultations, conservation guidance, design team meetings etc. are available through a number of different platforms.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued business and support, and wish you & yours the best during this challenging time.

 

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started